Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conference Series LLC LTD Events with over 1000+ Conferences, 1000+ Symposiums and 1000+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business.

Explore and learn more about Conference Series LLC LTD : World’s leading Event Organizer

Back

Ines Llamas-Ramos

Ines Llamas-Ramos

University Hospital of Salamanca, Spain

Title: Manual therapy and dry needling in the treatment of chronic mechanical neck pain

Biography

Biography: Ines Llamas-Ramos

Abstract

Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint, with a point prevalence of 15% of males and 23% of females
experiencing symptoms. Recent evidence suggests that trigger point (TrP) dry needling (DN) could be effective in
the treatment of neck pain. However, no studies have directly compared the outcomes of TrP DN and TrP manual therapy
(MT) in this population. This randomized clinical study compares the effects of TrP DN and TrP MT on pain, function,
pressure pain sensitivity, and cervical range of motion in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain. Ninety-four patients
(mean±SD age, 31±3 years; 66% female) were randomized into a TrP DN group (n=47) or a TrP MT group (n=47). Neck
pain intensity (11-point numeric pain rating scale), cervical range of motion, and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) over
the spinous process of C7 were measured at baseline, postintervention, and at follow-ups of 1 week and 2 weeks after
treatment. The Spanish version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire was used to measure disability/function
at baseline and the 2-week follow-up. Mixed-model, repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were used to
determine if a time-by-group interaction existed on the effects of the treatment on each outcome variable, with time as
the within-subject variable and group as the between-subject variable. In relation to the results, the ANOVA revealed
that participants who received TrP DN had outcomes similar to those who received TrP MT in terms of pain, function,
and cervical range of motion. The 4-by-2 mixed-model ANOVA also revealed a significant time-by-group interaction
(P<.001) for PPT: patients who received TrP DN experienced a greater increase in PPT (decreased pressure sensitivity)
than those who received TrP MT at all follow-up periods (between-group differences: posttreatment, 59.0 kPa; 95%
confidence interval [CI]: 40.0, 69.2; 1-week follow-up, 69.2 kPa; 95% CI: 49.5, 79.1; 2-week follow-up, 78.9 kPa; 95%
CI: 49.5, 89.0). We can conclude that 2 sessions of TrP DN and TrP MT resulted in similar outcomes in terms of pain,
disability, and cervical range of motion. Those in the TrP DN group experienced greater improvements in PPT over the
cervical spine. Future trials are needed to examine the effects of TrP DN and TrP MT over long-term follow-up periods.